32 Comments

  1. I bought an 81 Camaro with the 267 in it. It couldn’t even burn rubber. I have now installed a 350 and look forward to letting it rip in the summer!
    Also interested in the results in this video!

  2. Hi I think some of the problem with the Dart heads is the larger 76 cc combustion chamber. Lower compression ratio results in lower output. What was the runner volume of the Dart head? The previous heads were a factory casting and the runners are pretty small on those. If the Dart's had a larger runner, they were probably better suited to a larger engine or an engine with a higher peak horsepower rpm. Was the camshaft the same one used both times? What was the horsepower peak rpm with the factory castings? Just trying to figure out why the engine didn't perform as expected. Andrew

  3. Quick question: Do you have the specifics on the cam(s) in play.? Seat timing, (.006"), duration at .050", LSA and installed ICL.
    I noodle around with SBC's as a hobby and have many examples in simulations as well as my own half dozen or so street and or strip engines. Camshafts and cylinder are my primary focus.
    Thanks as always. Keep up the good work. (FTR: I tested and tuned regularly at the three southern Ontario tracks back in the day. Beatty and Woods were my go to machine shop back then.)

  4. I think cost comparison will matter. And availability. Its about impossible here in Ca to find any 60-70's decent head castings. Paying a shop to rebuild including parts and porting labor(or not if doing at home porting) and i bet the new castings arent really any more money. Plus a new casting, not rotted or stressed. Just my humble thoughts.

  5. World products heads are not top choice for 350 maybe too much head for application. The ported small valve heads were really good. I got brodix 180 heads for a similiar 350. Trial and error. Thanks for video.

  6. Yep, have had a telescoping magnet for more years than I can count, and it always comes in useful when you'd least expect it!! Until you've had one, you don't realize how bad you've needed one! lol

  7. That's why I asked about the torque peak from the SR heads on the last vid, Mikes ported heads were better. Whilst they should never have had leaking valves, that amount of leakage on a 44 ci cylinder is nothing. SBC conundrum was always heads back in the day, we're blessed for choice now.

  8. I am swapping a vortec 7.4 into an old impala that had a 400 small block. I am keeping the tuned port and using the most cam the computer can handle and using a matching 4l80e for the overdrive.
    Anyway, the 400 had the fuelie heads and runs pretty darn good, has 80k original miles on it. I was thinking of putting it in an older muscle truck build, how much cam could that engine handle? I onow the fuelie heads are now considered anchors, but theres a lot worse out there on small blocks and this set up is free. Love the show sir!

  9. Alot of people talk techy jibber jabber. I get in some arguments about my experience and even those SA motorbooks at barnes&noble. About compression. Compression is the last power adder. First and most gains come froms cam and free breathing heads. Then cubic inches. Aside from carb and intake. Has anybody done actual testing. Take the same engine and start with 8.1 compression. Then redo same engine with 12.1 compression. The gain in power from compression is minimal compared to bolting on a large cam and big heads. Prove my point? Has anyone watched or read the article and video of the 454 motor home engine? They took a 35,000 mile low compression motor home engine and dynoed stock made 335hp and 485lbs ft. Then they kept the completely stock bottom and added an trick flo top end kit with Holley. Bang! 567HP and 530+lbs ft. Thats serious power for 87 octane. Cubic inches and breathing make majority of power. Not compression. So out the door with the "you cant have a big cam unless high compression " nonsense. Maybe advise from a great hands on backyard mechanic not bad after all.

  10. maybe you could list the heads you tested and let people know it's not money well spent and maybe get a set of Vortec heads and a good aftermarket set and test those or reference some Eric Weingartner videos where he flow benches most all the heads available and show the cream and crap of the crop heads out there he even tests camel backs and other factory heads as well.

  11. AAAHHHH……..MOPAR coming up!!!!! I"m collecting parts for a LA 408 stroker . i have the block and trick flow heads so far .interested in your comments and 340 build.My engine will have a scat forged rotating assembly ,10.4 comp. with the 60cc chambers,RPM dual plane and small roller cam.

  12. Allan, i could barely hear what you were trying to tell us when you were outside with the water tank. Is the dyno water recirculated? Does the engine coolant have a separate liquid to liquid heat exchanger or something different? As I know you treat builds and dyno sessions as research experiments, did you study the original spring installed and full lift forces with the valve train components and determine that you should or should not have expected valve float at ~5300 rpm? Thank you Cabot

  13. 8:07 do you think the cost of traditional SBC heads (or anything SBC for that matter) has become less cost effective than LS stuff? I'm not one of those "LS swap the world" guys. Just truly curious. Their design seems so much more efficient across many stock heads compared to SBC, and they've been around long enough that one would think the SBC has fallen out of favour.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2024 Grudge Races - GrudgeRaces.Com - WordPress Theme by WPEnjoy